Skip to content
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

The Canadian Beverage Association

  • News & Media
    • Overview
    • Press Releases
    • Articles
    • Archive
  • Beverages
    • Overview
    • Soft Drinks
    • Juices
    • Water
    • Sports Drinks
    • Energy Drinks
    • Teas
  • Initiatives
    • Overview
    • Balance Calories
    • Clear On Calories
    • Guidelines
    • Recycling & Packaging
    • Stewardship
    • Regulatory information
    • Canada Plastics Pact
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • ▸
  • News & Media
  • ▸
  • Posts
  • ▸
  • Want to Know How to Tell Good Science From Bad

For Media Inquiries

Please Contact:

Julia Caslin
julia@canadianbeverage.ca

Search

Follow Us

  •  
  •  
  •  

Categories

  • Aspartame
  • Balance Calories
  • Bottled Water
  • BPA
  • Caffeine
  • Calories
  • Clear on Calories
  • Energy Drinks
  • Environment/Recycling
  • Guidelines
  • Health
  • Hydration
  • Ingredients
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Low Calorie Sweetener
  • Marketing
  • Myths & Facts
  • Obesity
  • Sports Drinks
  • Sugar
  • Taxation
  • Uncategorized

Categories

Archives

  • November 2021
  • April 2021
  • January 2021
  • September 2020
  • April 2016
  • November 2015
  • January 2015
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • May 2014
  • March 2014
  • January 2014
  • September 2013
  • February 2013

Archives

Want to Know How to Tell Good Science From Bad

With research appearing almost daily in the media and then living online, using good judgment to determine what results count is getting more and more difficult. How does one begin to tell good science from not so good science? Compound Interest, a blog looking at chemistry and chemical reactions, posted a great 12 step infographic that walks through the things you need to think about when deciding the quality and validity of research. It isn’t conclusive but it does give you a really good place to start. The 12 points are:

  1.  Sensationalized headlines
  2. Misinterpreted results
  3. Conflict of interest
  4. Correlation & Causation
  5. Speculative language
  6. Sample size too small
  7. Unrepresentative samples
  8. No control group used
  9. No blind testing used
  10. “Cherry-picked” results
  11. Unreplicable results
  12. Journals and citations

 

See more at www.compoundchem.com

< Back To Overview

The Canadian Beverage Association

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

CONNECT
WITH US

  • Home
  • News & Media
    • Press Releases
    • Articles
    • Blog Posts
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Beverages
    • Soft Drinks
    • Juices
    • Bottled Water
    • Sports Drinks
    • Energy Drinks
    • Teas
  • Industry Initiatives
    • Balance Calories
    • Clear On Calories
    • Guidelines
    • Recycling & Packaging
    • Stewardship
    • Regulatory information

© 2023 CanadianBeverageAssociation.ca

Web Development by Encoded Cloud